After watching Special Assignment the other night, the show was about young girls and their sugar daddies, I’ve been wondering about the unwritten Laws of Attraction. What are we allowed and not allowed to find attractive in a potential mate?
In the past, most marriages were arranged with money and status in mind. In fact, even today in cultures where marriages are still arranged, these are two very important factors. But, in modern society, the term “gold digger” is not exactly complementary. Yet many men flaunt what they have in an attempt to attract a mate. So, is a woman not allowed to be attracted to a man because she perceives that he will be able to provide for her material needs?
Then there is physical attraction. In this regard much more pressure seems to be placed on women, to be physically appealing in order to attract a mate. But most women don’t want to be seen just as sexual objects. So if a woman dresses alluringly, can she be disappointed if a man can’t see past her physical beauty?
I’m not sure what’s right and wrong, I think: To each man his own. I do believe that you will get exactly what you’re looking for. If the most important quality you’re looking for in a mate is physical beauty or material riches, you’re probably going to find that, but you’re not guaranteed anything else. You might end up with the richest guy you’ve ever met, but you’re not guaranteed that he will be good to you.
I thought I knew what I wanted, but now I think I know better what I don’t want.
First and foremost I don’t want a stupid man. What the hell is there to talk about with a stupid man?
I don’t need a man to support me, but I also don’t want to have to support a man all my life! Maybe I’m just not a modern enough woman.
And last but not least, I don’t want to have to change a man! If I don’t like him the way I find him, then he’s not for me. No smoothing the rough edges for me, thank you very much!
Am I asking for too much?